Elsevier

Journal of Econometrics

Volume 52, Issues 1–2, April–May 1992, Pages 267-287
Journal of Econometrics

Stock market volatility and the information content of stock index options

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(92)90073-ZGet rights and content

Abstract

Previous studies of the information content of the implied volatilities from the prices of call options have used a cross-sectional regression approach. This paper compares the information content of the implied volatilities from call options on the S&P 100 index to GARCH (Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity) and Exponential GARCH models of conditional volatility. By adding the implied volatility to GARCH and EGARCH models as an exogenous variable, the within-sample incremental information content of implied volatilities can be examined using a likelihood ratio test of several nested models for conditional volatility. The out-of-sample predictive content of these models is also examined by regressing ex post volatility on the implied volatilities and the forecasts from GARCH and EGARCH models.

References (32)

  • James B. Wiggins

    Option values under stochastic volatility: Theory and empirical estimates

    Journal of Financial Economics

    (1987)
  • Vedat Akgiray

    Conditional heteroscedasticity in time series of stock returns: Evidence and forecasts

    Journal of Business

    (1989)
  • Fischer Black

    Studies of stock price volatility changes

  • Fischer Black et al.

    The pricing of options and corporate liabilities

    Journal of Political Economy

    (1973)
  • Tim Bollerslev et al.

    Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of dynamic models with time-varying covariances

    (1988)
  • Tim Bollerslev et al.

    A capital asset pricing model with time-varying covariances

    Journal of Political Economy

    (1988)
  • Cited by (366)

    • No country for old distributions? On the comparison of implied option parameters between the Brownian motion and variance gamma process

      2021, Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance
      Citation Excerpt :

      A weekly pattern is pointed out by Jones and Shemesh (2018) and Peña et al. (1999). In the style of these approaches and selection criteria of, e.g., Day and Lewis (1992), we extend the analysis and add dummy measures for the last trading day and shortest-term options. For all daily measures (e.g., beta of CAPM), we apply a time window of 60 days following Peña et al. (1999).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text